E-Mail This Post/Page
August 17th, 2010 Rrishi Raote

The new rupee symbolHow many of you readers like the new rupee symbol?

I don’t (despite a caveat, which we’ll get to). Here’s why.

It is extremely predictable

Everyone knows what a Devanagari “r” looks like. It’s an elegant letter, but is that enough? If you think about it, the other major currency symbols come with a lot of history. There are several hypotheses regarding the origin of the $ sign, for instance. Was it from an 18th- and 19th-century abbreviation for the Mexican peso? Does it recall the Spanish “pieces of eight”, the ones that were mined in Peru and shipped across the Atlantic to Europe to pay for Spain’s wars and fuel a worldwide 16th-century price boom? Does it have something to do with the Greek god Hermes? There are more — lots more.

The sign for the UK pound sterling, £, originates from “L” for the Roman libra, a unit of weight. The word comes from the Latin for “weighing scale”. So it is well over 2,000 years old.

The euro, €, is, and looks like, something delivered by a committee. E for Europe. But also € from the Greek letter epsilon, or Є. So it is even older than the £. And at least it looks interesting in different fonts.

The yen sign, ¥, is boring. Fortunately, we hardly ever need to use it in India.

It is not user-friendly

You can make the $ with two strokes of a pen — one wiggly one and one straight down. Satisfying.

You can make the £ likewise with two strokes, one wiggly, one straight. Even more satisfying to execute than the $, though handwriting experts may cavill that the last stroke doesn’t point egotistically straight down the page towards the writer.

The € can also be dispensed with in two strokes, and happily the straight stroke (as in the £) leaves your pen heading rightwards, which is convenient for starting the next word or number.

The rupee sign? This will take all of four laborious strokes. A curve, a diagonal slice, and two short horizontals. You try assembling all these strokes correctly while writing in a hurry. And nobody writes slowly and painstakingly nowadays.

What’s more, while writing, not many people like sharp angles. They are less easy to execute than curves. Which is why the Devanagari “r” usually gains a little loop in the middle where the curve meets the diagonal. That will turn four strokes into three. But now imagine a rupee sign with a loop and two horizontal strokes. Yuck.

Do a scribble shortcut, and leave out one of the horizontal strokes. Now you have a traditional Devanagari “r” with one horizontal line. That would look like a vowel sign added to the consonant: “ru”. That is no longer a symbol, it is an abbreviation.

The ¥ is boring. It takes at least three strokes, and also fails the handwriting test.

It bothers and tricks the eye

Have you seen the rupee sign in print? It’s quickly taking over in the print media. It is not well designed.  In headlines it looks remarkably blocky next to the elegant shapes of the professionally designed fonts we use. In text it cannot properly be made out because the two horizontal strokes obscure the lovely curve of the Devanagari “r”.

What’s worse, when you place it before a number, it looks at first glance like a “2″, especially for one accustomed to reading Hindi numerals. So, what used to be “Rs 5,500″ will now look at first glance like “25,500″. That is a design problem.

The $ does not look like a 5. The £ does not look like an L. The € does not look like an E. (It looks like half an egg.) The ¥ is boring.

It is unrepresentative of India

Yes, Devanagari, alongside Roman (English), is the most widely used script in the land. But that does not make it representative of the nation. So why should the Devanagari “r” stand for the Indian rupee? I happen to think the Telugu “ra” is beautiful. The Bengali “r” has promise. The Tamil “r” is intriguing. Why not any of those? Indians not familiar with Telugu, Bengali or Tamil would then be able to see the rupee sign for what it really is: a symbol.

If none of the non-Devanagari signs are politically palatable, then how about English? We use it all over. Why not fool around with the well-established R?

For that matter, why not dispense with alphabets altogether and invent a pure symbol?

Too difficult, perhaps, because (and here we come to the caveat)…

The other designers seem to be asleep

The official rupee sign may not be so bad after all. Do please have a look at some of the other designs (here’s a larger image). Terrible! If those were the kinds of options the government had, then thank you very much after all, Udaya Kumar — he designed the chosen sign.

What do you think?

5 Votes | Average: 4.6 out of 55 Votes | Average: 4.6 out of 55 Votes | Average: 4.6 out of 55 Votes | Average: 4.6 out of 55 Votes | Average: 4.6 out of 5 (5 votes, average: 4.6 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...


All the content posted in the 'Business Standard Blogs' section, unless specified otherwise, are made by Business Standard employees. The content posted in 'Business Standard Blogs' does not follow routine internal Business Standard reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the employees and not of Business Standard. digg:Shortchanged? newsvine:Shortchanged? reddit:Shortchanged? Y!:Shortchanged?

9 Responses to “Shortchanged?”

  1. Gargi Says:

    I rather like the symbol actually. Though its not great and doesn’t carry a history, it makes for a good currency symbol. Anyway I suspect if it is not widely liked they might have another contest to redesign it.

  2. ushamrita Says:

    Dear Rishi,

    I am a supporter of free speech and debate, most definitely.
    I commented on your post because I felt the reasons mentioned therein do not seem to warrant such a strong disapproval of the ‘Re’ symbol, at least in my opinion.
    However, at the end of the day, your opinion remains unchanged, and so does mine!
    It’s a vicious circle.
    So, let’s leave it at that.
    And I positively enjoy reading solid reviews of books/ films/ drama/ restaurants. :-)
    Look forward to read your next post too!


  3. Rrishi Raote Says:

    Ushamrita: It doesn’t work that way. If it did, then nobody who had no hand in any particular thing would ever be allowed to comment on it. Imagine never commenting on politics, just because one is not a politician! Not saying a word about how tasty someone’s food is just because one doesn’t cook. Etc. I assume you don’t approve of film or theatre or music or book reviews either?

  4. ushamrita Says:

    Dear Rishi,

    Your point is noted.
    However, one would like to know whether you, yourself, made any contribution to the designing of the ‘Re’ symbol.
    If yes, this post is justified.
    If not, it would be nice if you refrained from being so zealously against something that already enjoys a high degree of acceptance.


  5. Rrishi Raote Says:

    One thing I discovered (after writing this, of course!) was that there are in fact quite a few currencies with their own signs. Most of them are straightforward, such as the Nigerian naira, an N with two strikes through it: ₦.

    Ravi: I take your point — it does stand out, but I wonder if that’s on account of its novelty? Do you think it will work as well two years down the line? Perhaps we’ll all be used to it by then. You may well be right.

    Nilesh: Yes, so peculiar to have such a lot of fuss made over a relatively minor thing, when so much else needs our attention. Jingoism!!

    Jagannath: Thanks! But please explain — one way or another that sounds like a provocative statement.

    Deep: Yes, but it’s only one letter of Sanskrit or Hindi, no story associated… For the same reason the Nigerian ₦ is not a very interesting sign.

  6. deep Says:

    As far as the history goes, it goes without saying that Sanskrit and Hindi have a much deeper history compared to Latin/English/Italian!

    The point about multiple strokes is true.

  7. Jagannath Says:

    i am glad you wrote this blog. This rupee symbol is as hideous as it can get. A love progeny of Chinese and Russian currencies smacks of a conspiracy.

  8. nilesh Says:

    I wasn’t impressed with the symbol at all. Yes, I agree with you, Rrishi, that if at all you’re making a symbol, it shoudl be aesthetically appealing and easy to reproduce as well. But the larger issue here is this: we’ve been without a symbol for so many years. Where was the need to have one now? What are we celebrating — the prospect of achieving double-digit GDP growth when a very large part of the population is below the official poverty line? A booming stock market when prices of basic foodgrains and pulses have gone up more than six-fold in the past two-three years? India Inc’s so called glory that comes at the cost of farmers who are still killing themselves despite the loan waiver?

  9. ravi Says:

    i absolutely love the design, i think it is a fitting symbol for the indian curreny……all indian scripts are have very curvy letters so i dont find any issues on that front…….@ your comment that it can be mistaken for a “2″ - dude are u even serious? it totally stands out and is easily recognisable as a symbol…..


All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of Business Standard, unless specified otherwise. Business Standard is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of Business Standard.

Leave a Reply