Controversial essay leads to uproar—or does it?

E-Mail This Post/Page
August 18th, 2009 Vikram Johri

An article written by a Chinese demagogue for a “patriotic” website has received surprisingly scant attention in India. Zhan Lue (a pseudonym for ‘strategy’) of the Institute for International Strategic Studies has written a widely circulated article that advocates China should work at splitting India into 30 states and take the help of Pakistan and other neighbours to bring this about.

The squeamishness of the Indian media is shocking. This should be headline stuff. Rarely does policy intent emerge with such forthrightness and the last thing we can do is to tide over the matter and brush it under the carpet by invoking peace and goodwill.

India and China met recently for border talks and in spite of the diplomatic noises emanating from that meeting, it is common knowledge that China has long harboured designs on India’s north-east. But Zhan Lue takes it to the next ghastly level: “China can dismember the so-called ‘Indian Union’ with one little move! China should join forces with ‘different nationalities’ such as Tamil and Kashmiri people so that they can establish independent nation states of their own.”

If that’s not language that closely mirrors the Pakistani Army’s stated intention to bleed India through a thousand cuts, I can’t say what is. Interestingly, the article was posted around the same time as the two countries met for border talks.

In a nasty dig at the concept of ‘Chindia’ (coined by Jairam Ramesh to denote the economic rise of the emerging economic giants), Zhan Lue says there can’t be two suns in the sky, and that “China and India cannot really deal with each other harmoniously.”

While there has been no word from the Chinese government on the matter, India has, unbelievably, offered the olive branch by saying that relations between the two countries are stable. “The Chinese side has conveyed to us that in approaching India-China relations, China abides by the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence. One of these principles stresses respect for territorial integrity and sovereignty,” a foreign ministry spokesman said.

This, when the article could not have been posted on a well-known site and then freely disseminated without the consent of the Chinese authorities. At the very least, the government should have released a stronger statement denouncing the article and asking the Chinese government to do the same.

The economic miracle that has allowed China to have its way in the international geostrategic stakes is likely to tilt the balance in its favour in international forums. America, especially in the post-September 2008 world, cannot afford to annoy China. Irrespective of what the international community might say about the Dalai Lama/Tibet/human rights abuses, China does what it wants to, as happened recently in Xinjiang. India must treat with caution any suggestions that our partnership with the US is “natural” and must brace itself for all eventualities.

12 Votes | Average: 4 out of 512 Votes | Average: 4 out of 512 Votes | Average: 4 out of 512 Votes | Average: 4 out of 512 Votes | Average: 4 out of 5 (12 votes, average: 4 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Disclaimer

All the content posted in the 'Business Standard Blogs' section, unless specified otherwise, are made by Business Standard employees. The content posted in 'Business Standard Blogs' does not follow routine internal Business Standard reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the employees and not of Business Standard.
del.icio.us:Controversial essay leads to uproar—or does it? digg:Controversial essay leads to uproar—or does it? reddit:Controversial essay leads to uproar—or does it? Y!:Controversial essay leads to uproar—or does it?

8 Responses to “Controversial essay leads to uproar—or does it?”

  1. Proud Indian Says:

    Media doesn’t give a damn bcoz it is so silly. How can China split India?
    You need Nehru, Sardar Patel, Jinnah to do it, as Jaswantsinghji has told us

  2. Nikhil Says:

    i dont think it is a big issue to be discussed about. I would say, it is more of a ‘Sansani’ kind stuff and should be discussed over there. Moreover, media should talk about peace, hope etc. and not about some stupid article in some corner of the world.
    thanks

  3. Robin Jacob Abraham Says:

    I have never understood why the threat from China is so underplayed in media circles. The obsession with Pakistan has only helped us cast a blind eye to more pertinent issues at hand

  4. Rahul Says:

    Well, I agree that the article must raise eyebrows amongst our leadership. It must also make us think and reflect on the fact that even we donot treat everyone across the nation equally. The day we know that all people from different religions, regions etc etc, are same we might not worry about such articles. The feeling of unity must manifest in actions not in articles. Forced nationalism and patriotism has never helped any nation.

  5. Sharma SR Says:

    are we being short sighted by ignoring the omnious warnings being sent out by China

  6. SAN Says:

    Well…. DS Rajan has been writing about this…MEA oddly, seems to believe that pushing things under the carpet / taking an ostrich like stance would somehow blow away the problem…the current heads at the MEA are seriously incompetent.. .first there was the faus pax about the pak statement, now this….

  7. Arun Shrivastav Says:

    That is the difference between two countries. While media in China has a purpose, Indian media is run by the editor and his nephew, niece, cousines, country cousines, fellow castemen, and women. So, you have news items to satisfy thier interests. Journalistic inquisitiveness will take time to descend on them. What do you say about neopotism in Indian Media?

  8. Kalyan Says:

    Hopefully, now the media will take notice.

Disclaimer

All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of Business Standard, unless specified otherwise. Business Standard is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of Business Standard.

Leave a Reply