Attack of doubt

E-Mail This Post/Page
February 15th, 2012 Rrishi Raote

Iran is on the cusp of producing a nuclear weapon, says Israel. Because Israel is currently making so much noise about this, newspaper writers are wondering whether Israel is about to attack Iran.

Robert Fisk of the UK Independent, who has reported from West Asia for many years and has seen it all — more than once — has reminded readers that Israeli leaders have been saying the same thing about Iran’s nuclear programme since 1992.

Israel has attacked suspected nuclear facilities in nearby countries at least twice before: once in 1981 when it bombed a reactor in Iraq, and once again in 2007 in Syria.

This round of Israel’s anti-Iran campaign seems already to have begun — and not just via PR. At least three Iranian nuclear scientists have been assassinated recently by car bombs said to be very like the one that wounded the Israeli defence attache’s wife in Delhi on Monday. The Western media take it pretty much for granted that these killings were the work of Israel’s intelligence agency, called Mossad.

If this is so, it is possible that the Delhi attack might be part of Iran’s retaliation. (Though how silly of Iran to do anything to annoy one of its few big-country friends.) This is what the Israeli government was very quick to say on Monday, that Iran did this, even before any firm information was available about the attack itself. It has stuck to this line.

Two hectic days later, the news is still not exactly firm. Who knows what the intelligence agencies have learned, but as far as the news media are concerned the facts appear to be slippery.

Was there a motorcyclist after all, who drove past and stuck the bomb to the back of the embassy car? One eyewitness, driving behind, says he saw him and that his bike was red, and that he wore a helmet. But this biker is nowhere to be seen, say most of today’s papers, in the footage from 30, or 16, or 18 (variously reported) CCTVs in the area. The footage shows the embassy car, for sure, but no bike or biker.

One paper reports that “enhanced” video from a camera outside a local billionaire’s home has caught the man and that he wore a backpack. Intriguingly the same report suggests that high-resolution satellite imagery of that moment shows (I’m not making this up) that the bike was a Bajaj Pulsar.

The Israeli woman who was injured says she turned around and saw a motorcyclist actually throw something at her car, which then exploded.

The police commissioner says the biker either bumped into or pushed aside the red plastic bollards that divide the lanes, and sped away in a different direction, and that he must have been well trained. The police also say that the biker’s licence plate was “blank”.

However, two men in the car directly behind the embassy car at the traffic light, who were themselves lightly injured in the blast, say they saw no motorcyclist anywhere around.

Mysterious!

Then, the embassy car’s driver says that after the blast he opened the rear door and pulled out his employer’s wife, and that there were no bystanders around. He cajoled an autowala to take them back to the embassy gate. However, early photos of the event by a passing journalist (here and here), and Twitter posts by him, suggest that the Israeli woman was flung a good distance from the car, where she was in fact helped up by bystanders — he has photographs. Another paper reports that both driver and woman were pulled from the car by bystanders.

These are just the most obvious questions, to a newspaper reader. There are lesser ones, such as how long the embassy car spent in Khan Market while the victim and her husband were lunching. Was it half an hour, as the driver says, or one hour, as the police version goes? I don’t mean to question the official version of events, such as it is, only to point out how diverse are the reports on such crucial issues as what happened immediately before and immediately after the blast, that eyewitnesses accounts are a curious mix of reliable and unreliable, and that even technology is at most a mixed blessing in the search for answers.

Answers, not truth, because Israel was so quick to identify the source of the hit as Iran. It is the answer that suits Israel right now. It may well be the right answer, but what if it isn’t?

3 Votes | Average: 5 out of 53 Votes | Average: 5 out of 53 Votes | Average: 5 out of 53 Votes | Average: 5 out of 53 Votes | Average: 5 out of 5 (3 votes, average: 5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Disclaimer

All the content posted in the 'Business Standard Blogs' section, unless specified otherwise, are made by Business Standard employees. The content posted in 'Business Standard Blogs' does not follow routine internal Business Standard reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the employees and not of Business Standard.
del.icio.us:Attack of doubt digg:Attack of doubt newsvine:Attack of doubt reddit:Attack of doubt Y!:Attack of doubt

6 Responses to “Attack of doubt”

  1. Hartmut Says:

    Once again Obama and his administration have porven to be dangerously naive and inept in foreign policy. Isreal is surrounded by Arab Islamic states, many of whom deny Isreal’s right to exist. When these states see that U.S. support for Isreal has diminished, it emboldens them to strike against Isreal. Of course Obama and his administration will say they fully support Isreal, but actions speak louder than words. The actions of the Obama administration have made it clear that they are more interested in cultivating relationships with Arab Islamic states than maintaining a strong relationship with our only ally in the middle east.Obama’s refusal to halt the production and importation of weapons grade plutonium into Iran for purposes of developing a nuclear weapon puts Isreal, the middle east and the U.S. in grave danger. Due to the failure of the Obama administration to act decisively with Iran, Isreal will launch a pre-emptive strike to ensure its own survival. Ahmedinejad’s threats to annhilate Isreal are taken seriously by Isreal and with good reason. The U.S. has an inexperienced juvinile in charge who is pro-Islamic and who thinks he can charm middle eastern states into just getting along with Isreal. Mr. Obama is the Neville Chamberlain of our time and will prove to be even more dangerous to world peace and stability than was Chamberlain. And all the while, those very people that Obama believes he is charming, like Ahmedinejad and Kim Jong IL, are laughing at him and our intrepid Secretary of State.

  2. esskay Says:

    I knew it, all along! It has to be Israel’s own doing, so they could frame Iran and irk India and drive a wedge in their diplomacy, all at the same time. The pawns in this conspiracy just didn’t practise their versions enough to be in sync with each other…

    As for the Georgia attack, it was foiled, Vikram, remember! Just to, may be, put Indian intelligence off the scent…?

  3. Rrishi Says:

    Vikram: I’m well, hope you are too. You’re probably right about the foreign hand (da-da-da-daaaaa). However, the attack doesn’t sound like something an Iranian agency would do by design. Perhaps what they call a “rogue element”. I mean, Mossad supposedly kills top Iranian nuclear scientists — and Iran kills the wife of a diplomat in a quietish posting, who is on her way to collect her children from school? Odd, no?

  4. Vikram Johri Says:

    Hi Rrishi, you raise valid concerns here, but it is very unlikely that anybody but Iran (or maybe Hizbollah/Hamas but the method of attack rules them out) at this moment will be interested in bombing an Israeli Embassy vehicle, especially when a similar incident happened on the same day in Georgia.

    Hope you are well!

  5. Rrishi Raote Says:

    Omigosh: I was wrong! I take it all back! Thank you, O Great Shiny Satan, for the illumination!

  6. Omigosh Says:

    What?! Are you seriously questioning the ‘TRUTH’ of the GLOBAL ESTABLISHMENT? That too sitting in the world’s biggest English speaking country?
    Did you not see the loud-and-clear EVIDENCE from around the world indicating who the bad guys are and who the good guys? Did you not closely read reports of the Bangkok incident in which Iranian no-gooders blasted their own home and also blew off the legs of one of their own in their attack on Israeli interests?
    Did you not see how Iran’s ‘HOLOCAUST-DENIER’ President Ahemwhatsisname got away saying that the Holocaust has been mythologized/idolized for a geostrategic purpose?
    Doubt? What doubt? You’re joking, right?

Disclaimer

All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of Business Standard, unless specified otherwise. Business Standard is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of Business Standard.

Leave a Reply