Beyond Reach

E-Mail This Post/Page
June 20th, 2009 Praveen Bose

I often end up tearing my hair in frustration when I am reading something or find something to read online and I am ‘told’ to pay up to continue reading. While it makes perfect economic and business sense for the content provider, I am left wondering if the world is flat only for some people, and not all.

I may be stretching things too far when I try to extend the concept of the flat world to accessing the content on the world wide web. But, the affordability factor cannot be ignored. This must have been because many an article I wanted to read had to be paid in dollars or pounds when I earned in the humble rupees.

Five dollars may not be too much for an American or a Canadian, or many a European to read an article. But, for me, $5 is nearly Rs 250. It’s not a price I can afford to pay for a single article. It is what I may pay for a novel.
I had thought the future would be brighter for those who love to surf the Net for information and knowledge, when more and more content from magazines and newspapers were being made available for free.

But, costing pressures of the content providers i.e. magazines and journals is catching up it seems with free-riders like me. Despite all those cost-benefit analyses of free content online, I seemed to throw logic out of the window when surfing the world wide web looking for information or to read. This, when I am always trying to spread the ‘gyan’ on why we pay how much we pay for whay we use.

In social sense and commercial sense the world is indeed flat. A schoolmate, on his way to work in Toronto pings me to ask how I am doing while I am at work or am winding up my work for the day. Now I can ping him when he is on his way to work to enquire how a common friend was doing in Naples, while an ex-colleague pings me from Hong Kong to ask if my job is safe.

Wish the world would become flat in the sense of affordability too.

2 Votes | Average: 1 out of 52 Votes | Average: 1 out of 52 Votes | Average: 1 out of 52 Votes | Average: 1 out of 52 Votes | Average: 1 out of 5 (2 votes, average: 1 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Disclaimer

All the content posted in the 'Business Standard Blogs' section, unless specified otherwise, are made by Business Standard employees. The content posted in 'Business Standard Blogs' does not follow routine internal Business Standard reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the employees and not of Business Standard.
del.icio.us:Beyond Reach digg:Beyond Reach reddit:Beyond Reach Y!:Beyond Reach

2 Responses to “Beyond Reach”

  1. Preeti Chaohan Says:

    hi

    Nice blog post

    Thanks alot

  2. Pucca Ghati Says:

    Should the FT be pissing in its fish and chips ? would you in your Macher Jhol ? Advertising on a site like FT or the Economist ( I presume you do read these other than Ganashakti or Trinamul Tantrums, JNU liberation khobor ) is apparently not sufficient for it to be profitable - even if it is, trust John bull to ever let you in on it - and if it were then the physical paper would cease to exist ! Not a bad thing for the planet’s trees . However pay you must otherwise the FT would lose its exclusivity and will, eventually ,be required reading in College street and Chittrajan Park . Nah ! Not in India or for Indians . However for those in Bileat :sooner in the US than we think - but in India ? Raja of the DMK and Trinamul/CPM i.e. the Tamils and Bengalis will see to it that it is at least two centuries away ! Maybe other than these two States , the rest of us can quickly move to a online model ? Rahul and Sonia are the impediments too : would anybody with K12 education of the State Board kind - other than Delhiites with ICSC/CBSE brainfever and 101 % marks ever vote for the Au Par and her mullato ?

Disclaimer

All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of Business Standard, unless specified otherwise. Business Standard is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of Business Standard.

Leave a Reply