Nokia-Siemens pact

E-Mail This Post/Page
June 19th, 2006 Leslie D'Monte

The Siemens-Nokia pact is likely to spark a new global wave of consolidation and a round of price wars. The deal will create the world’s third-largest network equipment concern behind Ericsson and a combined Lucent and Alcatel. The transaction is also likely to put considerable pressure on Motorola which will be reduced to the No. 4 position as network
equipment maker in the world just as its business is turning around as a result of its hot-selling Razr cell phones.

New low-cost competitors entered the market, particularly from Asia. Huawei, for instance, has been able to win contracts in Asia in places where Lucent and others had previously been successful. Siemens had sold its cellphone handset division to BenQ of Taiwan last summer. BenQ still uses the Siemens brand name and Siemens factories in Germany, but the Taiwanese company ultimately hopes to build a brand of its own.

And Nokia has been looking to strengthen its network business to compete better with Motorola. Of course, what happens to Nortel Networks — The Canadian network equipment maker — is a big question.

2 Votes | Average: 4.5 out of 52 Votes | Average: 4.5 out of 52 Votes | Average: 4.5 out of 52 Votes | Average: 4.5 out of 52 Votes | Average: 4.5 out of 5 (2 votes, average: 4.5 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Disclaimer

All the content posted in the 'Business Standard Blogs' section, unless specified otherwise, are made by Business Standard employees. The content posted in 'Business Standard Blogs' does not follow routine internal Business Standard reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the employees and not of Business Standard.
del.icio.us:Nokia-Siemens pact digg:Nokia-Siemens pact reddit:Nokia-Siemens pact Y!:Nokia-Siemens pact

2 Responses to “Nokia-Siemens pact”

  1. Abhishek Says:

    Cartelisation! Can you smell it? Small fish gets together to challange the big one. Ultimately, they’d make the entry barriers high enough to make it difficult for the new incumbent. They’d also move in their own standards and charge a hefty fee for the patent royalties.

    As for Huawei, its been majorly financed by the Chinese Government, a charge that Huawei obviously denies.

  2. Roop Says:

    These majors have been forced to consolidate because of increasing competition and lower margins. This way they will be better placed to compete with Huawei and other chinese companies ( these are financed by the state at very low interest rates). I hope this merger will be synergic and they will continue to innovate and produce world class technolgies and products as before.

Disclaimer

All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of Business Standard, unless specified otherwise. Business Standard is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of Business Standard.

Leave a Reply