India’s cruelest joke: The Naxal war

E-Mail This Post/Page
July 24th, 2012 Devjyot Ghoshal

“All war is deception,” said Sun Tzu, the Chinese military general and philosopher, around 500 BC. Nothing could more accurately describe the Naxal conflict burning through India’s hinterland today.

It has been some time since I travelled to south Chhattisgarh, the heart of the ultra-Left revolution. There, I toured cities, towns and remote villages. I met key actors: the tribals caught in the crossfire, the chief minister, bureaucrats, the police brass, activists and many a journalist. All, except the rebels themselves.

The single, most-important takeaway was simply this: the Indian government and its agencies on the ground are fighting a nearly invisible enemy. Even though they clearly knows who exactly they should actually be fighting.

This is by no measure a ground-breaking discovery. For well over a decade now, the Indian state has recognised this complexity in its fight against the Naxals. It has admitted the sheer difficulty in distinguishing between an innocent tribal villager and an armed, motivated insurgent.

The problem is, despite years of fighting this bloody fight, the Indian government can do no better today. The storm that has erupted over the killing of 19 persons in Dantewada at the end of June is evidence of this. It has shown once again, with deadly consequences, that the security establishment is operating within a haze; and that once again, it is the people who have had to pay the price for this incompetence.

Across south Chhattisgarh, much of the security forces remain holed up in roadside camps surrounded by rings of barbed wire and sentry posts. These are men and women of exceptional courage, no doubt, but they are as good as aliens on a hostile planet. Those that freely operate outside, the erstwhile Special Police Officers, have built a reputation that few agree with. The highly-trained special forces contingents are few and far between.

The tribal villagers, caught between a government that promises to spend on them (but not without harassment) and a Naxal leadership that promises to keep the government out, often side with the latter. The government’s reach here is precarious, therefore its promises unreliable.

That’s not to say that the Naxal movement has delivered either. Those that have gained access say it is all the same, sometimes even a little worse. But, years of governmental apathy and heavy-handedness must have some manifestation. Also, those who have sided with the government have gained little; they live like virtual prisoners in well-protected camps, away from their forests and often their families, too.

Effectively, therefore, the Indian state, having spent crores of rupees and thousands of lives, has only a semblance of an intelligence network. For the security forces, finding an insurgent is not like looking for a needle in a haystack. Rather, it’s like looking for a specific needle in a sack of sharp needles.

So, all this talk about standard operating procedures (under the direction of the home ministry), procuring mine-proof vehicles, augmenting troop numbers and creating cutting-edge counter-terrorism schools is as good as useless. Unless, of course, collateral damage is the objective.

Instead, the government needs to reach the people. It must listen to them carefully and deliver development. It cannot anymore ignore years of misrule and not correct what it has done wrong. It shouldn’t try and push in big business before bringing in the most basic of services.

But most importantly, it must stop building a security machinery that doesn’t even know its precise target. It has to build trust through governance, to be then able to create a system that delivers reliable intelligence. It needs to gain control over information. After all, there can be no deception without information.

Otherwise, hundreds will continue to die as the Naxals quietly smirk under the shadow of the government’s ineptitude.

7 Votes | Average: 2.86 out of 57 Votes | Average: 2.86 out of 57 Votes | Average: 2.86 out of 57 Votes | Average: 2.86 out of 57 Votes | Average: 2.86 out of 5 (7 votes, average: 2.86 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...

Disclaimer

All the content posted in the 'Business Standard Blogs' section, unless specified otherwise, are made by Business Standard employees. The content posted in 'Business Standard Blogs' does not follow routine internal Business Standard reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the employees and not of Business Standard.
del.icio.us:India's cruelest joke: The Naxal war digg:India's cruelest joke: The Naxal war newsvine:India's cruelest joke: The Naxal war reddit:India's cruelest joke: The Naxal war Y!:India's cruelest joke: The Naxal war

5 Responses to “India’s cruelest joke: The Naxal war”

  1. Sutepe Says:

    F&F:It is nice to know you find the home minister’s stmt simlpe. As a person in a position of responsibility, he cannot start tapping on a calci. It might have helped had he spoken about the different kinds of dangers posed. Re. what you did not understand, just read his quote where he mentions deaths specifically due to insurgent activity, seemingly not taking cognisance of the other factors. I guess he has all the luck and is not called a mass murderer. Not until he feel the need to go on a fast, at least. TE:Don’t agree with you. There are political overtones. Even if statistically he is right, you cannot differentiate where victims are concerned. It is not like how many died to to dengue vs malaria. I agree about ground level differences between Naxalism and Maoism, and one tends to use them interchangeably because the core is similar. Naxalism is a Maoist ideology. Insurgent violence is terrorism, too. Motives may differ between homegrown and outside forces. Do share your notes.

  2. Deepak Says:

    The article is really great, no one outside country totally supporting these naxals they are in built, how weak we are as a nation, still been proud of “unity in diversity” from my child hood i find this word dangerous.

  3. Rahul Says:

    ” War is essential for establishment of justice and dharma”. By calling a terrorist threat a revolution, you have defeated the very essence of debate on this issue. Correction, there is nothing called Naxals, they are terrorists and extortionists. And please don’t fancily quote Sun tzu or any other philosopher, our own Chankya is way ahead in these thoughts and his Sam, Dam, Dand, Bhed philosophy is way ahead of its time.

  4. girish shah Says:

    my dear friend , when politicians are the kingpin of the naxals who is going to catch the politicians
    veerappan was eliminated when all the gains were made (sandalwood gains) and there was little to gain from then on /or may be veeru thought why should i share my spoils with the higher up? the same game is going on here in bihar/jharkhand i hope you get it the thief and policeman are the same

  5. abhinav Says:

    It seems the article is on more emotional lines. The need of the hour is intelligence. It would be foolish to believe that Naxals will cooperate if you do the development work without security apparatus. But so many incidences of naxals/ jehadi’s show that our intelligence network needs to be improved further. Of course winning the heart of people and bringing them to mainstream must be done at a faster pace.

Disclaimer

All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of Business Standard, unless specified otherwise. Business Standard is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of Business Standard.

Leave a Reply