Asia wants Anna

E-Mail This Post/Page
September 10th, 2011 Devjyot Ghoshal

Undoubtedly, I have jumped on the bandwagon horrifyingly late.

The Ramlila Maidan is now empty, the Centre is back in business trying to solve yet another act of terror and I finally have access to a particular news channel that features India’s most animated (and entertaining, if I may add) news anchor on the 9 p.m. slot.

But no excuse is good enough. After all, even from Straits of Singapore, Anna Hazare must have been unmissable. I must tell you that he indeed was. And how!

It wasn’t just restricted to my Indian friends, the gaggle of plugged-in local scribes that I meet occasionally or the subcontinent-focused academics in this city-state. A wider swathe of Asia, it would seem, was taken in by Hazare.

For all the admiration and disdain that has been lumped on this retired soldier since his movement picked up steam, one thing is certain: India hasn’t been this galvanised over a single issue, with the obvious exception of cricket, in a very long time.

And while India’s cricketing success, no matter how remarkable, has mostly gone ignored by much of Southeast Asia and China, Hazare’s movement has had a markedly different reaction.

It could well be the case of ‘everybody loves a good revolution’ in these heady days of regime change, but it isn’t merely the quality and quantity of coverage that this region’s media lavished on Hazare’s movement that has been surprising.

Rather, as an academic noted in a recent discussion at a local think-tank, Asian bloggers, including the prodigious community of Chinese micro-bloggers, have openly discussed the Hazare-led anti-graft movement.

From China’s Weibo, much like the English-speaking world’s Twitter, which has over 140 million users, conversations about Hazare and the campaign were picked up and reported, including by an Indian newspaper.

There was even a curious piece in a Tibetan news website that claimed the Chinese government had “banned 6,600 sites following growing numbers of netizens in China discussing a possible movement in China against corruption”, as a result of the “Anna effect”.

Conjecture apart, much of Asia suffers from the same ailments that drove millions of Indians on to the streets backing Hazare’s movement, asking for cleaner governmental administration. And this peculiarly-Indian movement has found resonance in parts of this region where people lack the space, both political and social, to vocally complain against the system.

Instead of theorising or judging the Hazare-led movement in India, the academic claimed, some in Asia are simply asking: “Where is our Anna?” After all, institutionalised corruption is a fact of life in this part of the world, whether it is China, Vietnam, Indonesia or in other countries of Southeast Asia.

As Asia’s emerging powers, China and India are relentlessly compared on nearly every parameter, starting from the size of their economies to the reproductive prowess of their population.

Our neighbours, as do many others, have much that we don’t. But “Anna is India, India is Anna”, as the refrain goes.

Nonetheless, this isn’t a comment about the man or the movement. This is about the conditions and systems that spawned them, but also provided them the space in which to protest.

7 Votes | Average: 4.57 out of 57 Votes | Average: 4.57 out of 57 Votes | Average: 4.57 out of 57 Votes | Average: 4.57 out of 57 Votes | Average: 4.57 out of 5 (7 votes, average: 4.57 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...


All the content posted in the 'Business Standard Blogs' section, unless specified otherwise, are made by Business Standard employees. The content posted in 'Business Standard Blogs' does not follow routine internal Business Standard reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the employees and not of Business Standard. wants Anna digg:Asia wants Anna newsvine:Asia wants Anna reddit:Asia wants Anna Y!:Asia wants Anna

One Response to “Asia wants Anna”

  1. Karna from Anga Says:

    As much Annas cause is right (fight against corruption), his way is not. He should act within the framework of the Indian constitution via parliament and not retort to blackmail.After all the parliament is the representative of 1.2 billion people, and the Indians deserve the parliment/politicians they elect. Theres way to go till India is Anna or Anna is India. Thinking Asia wants Anna is even more megalomania (what has China or Japan to do with Anna?)


All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of Business Standard, unless specified otherwise. Business Standard is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of Business Standard.

Leave a Reply