Abjure silence

E-Mail This Post/Page
April 6th, 2010 Devjyot Ghoshal

After Mumbai burnt on 26/11, India was hurting. As the dust settled, heads began to roll.

Notably, the dapper Shivraj Patil vacated command of the Home Ministry and the then Finance minister P Chidambaram took over.

That was before the economic slowdown came and went; before the Naxal upturn came and refused to go.

Last December, it was with some pride that Chidambaram stood in West Bengal’s capital city speaking of his unblemished record after taking over as Home Minister.

He claimed that the system had been improved, the sharing of intelligence streamlined and more importantly, the country’s complacency of terrorism had been shaken off. “It has been a terror-free year, so far. I hope it will end this way,” he said.

To the Naxals he said, “We will talk if you abjure violence.”

Two months later, a bakery in Pune was blown to bits.

Incidentally, Chidambaram was in Kolkata’s Writers’ Buildings just days before the terror attack attempting to coordinate the offensive against the Ultra Left rebels, or the now famous ‘Operation Green Hunt’.

It is another matter that two of the four chief ministers who were requested to attend the meeting did not turn up. Of the two who did, one sits in the very building they met in.

But all along, the hinterland burnt, while Chidambaram continued with his stance of ceasefire before conversation.

Subsequently, the telecommunication ping-pong ensued. The Home Ministry made public its public fax number, followed by the Naxals making public some random mobile number.

To believe that both couldn’t connect without the media playing matchmaker is absurd; that they wouldn’t is another matter.

As the situation deteriorated, including the firefight at the Silda camp where two dozen security personnel were killed, the demands for reconciliation increased steadily.

Even the Trinamool Congress’s enfant terrible Kabir Suman put his name down for a possible list of mediators between the Centre and the Naxals.

Last weekend, Chidambaram finally went to Lalgarh: Bengal’s geographical indicator for Naxalism. There, in a supposed spontaneous change in his itinerary, the signifier of the classes went to meet the masses.

“I, too, come from a village like yours, named Sivaganga, in Tamil Nadu,” the Harvard-educated minister is said to have told a villager.

But Sivaganga witnessed the opening of 43 bank branches during his previous tenure in the UPA government as Finance Minister. With it came some semblance of an attachment with India’s economic growth story.

Lalgarh, unfortunately, has none of that. The local police station doesn’t even have a proper rope to hold back over-enthusiastic journalists, reports said.

But the local Block Development Officer can’t be blamed. His office has reportedly been closed down. Now, no one is quite sure where the job cards, or the jobs, are coming from.

Chidambaram, however, stuck to his guns. He asked locals to resist the Naxal rebels and continue supporting the government, despite the latter having delivered next to nothing.

Not that the former have done much either, but thankfully they aren’t elected representatives.

Then, the Home Minister said, “The buck must stop on the chief minister’s table”.

After a night of rumination, the chief minister disapproved of Chidambaram’s analysis as “not good language”.

The Naxals have not said much, even though they are crucial to solving the particular debate and the larger problem.

The Centre, state governments in question and the rebels have to hit the table before one is seriously debilitated, and time is running out.

On Tuesday, over 70 paramilitary troops were killed in a series of ambushes at Dantewada, Chattisgarh.

In all likelihood, the fight will intensify and the body count will rise, unless talks start.

Instead of violence, maybe Chidambaram should considering abjuring silence. As a representative of the state, he has a monopoly over the former.

But the absence of the latter is key to ensuring that it stays that way.

9 Votes | Average: 1.22 out of 59 Votes | Average: 1.22 out of 59 Votes | Average: 1.22 out of 59 Votes | Average: 1.22 out of 59 Votes | Average: 1.22 out of 5 (9 votes, average: 1.22 out of 5)
Loading ... Loading ...


All the content posted in the 'Business Standard Blogs' section, unless specified otherwise, are made by Business Standard employees. The content posted in 'Business Standard Blogs' does not follow routine internal Business Standard reviews and editorial processes and should be considered only as the views and opinions of the employees and not of Business Standard.
del.icio.us:Abjure silence digg:Abjure silence newsvine:Abjure silence reddit:Abjure silence Y!:Abjure silence

7 Responses to “Abjure silence”

  1. Vivek Says:

    Will RBI real estate indexes brings out Black money from real estate?

  2. Omigosh Says:

    “In all likelihood, the fight will intensify and the body count will rise, unless talks start.”

    Wow… really?
    Would never have guessed.

  3. Pucca ghati Says:

    Nagas, Mizos, Manipuris, Tamils, Marathis, Sikhs, Assamese ,Kasmiris and now Marathis and Tribals once again , we have along list of Indian who have and are being oppressedand colonised . The Nagas,Kashmiris and Khalistanis are Chinese, Western and Islamic puppets , the rest are not . The biggest threat to India come from the North Indian Imperialist whose Capital is N.Delhi , who is thrusting his language ( Hindi) and his world view on the rest of us, raping others natural resources and causing demographic invasions . North India needs to be colonised and civilised , then others will stop feeling as second class citizen . Jai Maharashtra !

  4. Devjyot Says:


    Point well taken. However, I’m not suggesting that the two sides meet over tea and cake, and follow it up with a sit down dinner and cocktails. What I am suggesting is the need for dialogue. Remember Kashmir?

    Also, Veerappan was a sandal wood smuggler. Not part of an organisation concertedly fighting the Indian state, with a socio-political heritage stretching back to the late 1960s. The comparision with the D-Gang, too, is hardly fair.

  5. SAN Says:

    Next, you will want to sit down and talk with the D-gang, or Ajmal K and his mentors. Economic plight or any other justification cannot and should not be reason for taking to the path of violence. Veerappan thrived while emissaries continued to meet him. It took a bit of resolve by one lady to put the thug down where he belonged - six feet under. And here you are asking for thugs to be entertained.

  6. Christy Says:

    There is a growing disconnect between East India and the rest of the country - it would be better if a Minister of state in charge of East India is appointed and tasked with handling the problems there. PC is suave but supremely arrogant who will not change his opinions come-what-may.

  7. Sujata Setia Says:

    great piece!!


All the content posted under the 'Comments' category are made by the readers of Business Standard, unless specified otherwise. Business Standard is not responsible for the opinions of the readers and the content posted by the readers are not representative of the views and opinions of Business Standard.

Leave a Reply